Friday, March 28, 2008

Media to blame for Islamic misconceptions

Media to blame for Islamic misconceptions: "


PHUCKING TWAT: ’


The managing editor of one of the country’s biggest newspapers thinks news organizations ought to hire more Muslim reporters.


Philip Bennett, the Washington Post’s managing editor, said reporters often struggle with understanding Islam during a speech Monday at UCI about the difficulties of covering the religion.


Bennett’s speech focused on the media’s need to cover issues concerning Islam in an in-depth, long-term manner.


To illustrate this point he drew mainly from quotes of notable colleagues and statistical polls, rarely giving his own opinion directly.


‘Six of 10 Americans, according to a 2007 ABC Poll, don’t understand the basic tenets of Islam,’ Bennett said.


He attributed this to the lack of Muslims working in American newsrooms.


‘At the Post I want more Muslim readers and I want more Muslim journalists,’ he said.


Words poorly translated from Arabic to English are a big source of confusion caused by the lack of Muslim voices in the American media, according to Bennett.


Zeyad Maasarani, 22, a Muslim reporter for California’s most circulated Muslim publication, Southern California in Focus, agrees with Bennett that terms like ‘jihad,’ ‘madrasa’ and ‘hijab’ are a big source of the public’s misunderstanding of Islam.


NOW WHAT IS THERE TO MISUNDERSTAND ABOUT HIJAB



NOW WHAT IS THERE TO MISUNDERSTAND ABOUT MADRASA
NOW WHAT IS THERE TO MISUNDERSTAND ABOUT JIHAD

‘Jihad means holy war, which is the definition that most Americans know, but it also means struggle, and valiant attempt,’ Maasarani said.


YEAH YEAH
VALIANT ATTEMPT



One such word that has been contentiously debated in newsrooms is ‘Islamist,’ which generally refers to a political movement governed by Islamic law. Bennett said at the Washington Post editors still have not decided whether to add it to their style book.


SO THESE DUMB PHUCKS WHO ARE BEING PAID HIGH INCOMES CANNOT FIND OUT WHAT AN ISLAMIST IS
Some argue the word is a useful distinction for movements like Hamas and Hezbollah, but others at the Post argue that it is too vague and should be omitted in favor of a more specific description.


AMAZING THAT THESE WANKERS THAT ARE HIGHLY PAID TO INFORM US ARE SO IGNORANT TO THE FACT THAT THERE ALREADY EXISTS A DESCRIPTION


MUJAHIDEEN


WHY CANT THESE HIGHLY PAID WANKERS EXPLAIN TO US THAT

The root of mujahidin is J-H-D , meaning ‘fight against unbelievers’ (’Jihad’ can mean to fight and ‘Mujahideen’ can mean fighter.) However, the particular verb stem of J-H-D from which both jihad and mujahid are derived means ‘to fight against’ or ‘wage war’. Mujahid is originally, therefore, ’someone who fights’. The term has, even in Arabic, taken on meanings that are specifically religious, or specifically military or paramilitary, or both.


Bennett spent most of his time recalling an anecdote about a misunderstood Muslim group in Walkersville, Md., who were trying to purchase a large amount of land for a retreat.


The Ahmadiyya, an Islamic sect considered heretical through much of the Muslim world, did TV interviews, town hall meetings and even door-to-door interviews to try to convince the people of Walkersville that they meant well, according to Bennett, but the county zoning board ultimately denied permission to buy the land.


AHMADIYYA, THE SLOW DEATH OF DEMOCRACY


He cites cursorily researched articles in the local and national newspapers that neglected to figure out who the Ahmadiyya really were as a primary reason that their proposal was met with massive protests.


Bennett said that in the period following 9/11 there was a lot of uninformed writing about Islam, and that ‘the best journalism fought against the tide of public perception.’


YES MR BENNET, THERE HAS BEEN A LOT OF UNINFORMED WRITING ABOUT ISLAM, AND WE CAN BLAME PEOPLE LIKE YOU FOR ALL THE BULLSHIT THAT YOU AND THE REST OF MSM ARE CHURNING OUT


HAS ANY MSM PUBLISHED THE DANISH CARTOONS YET


(Via avideditorla’s shared items in Google Reader.)


"



(Via The Avid Editor's Insights.)

No comments: